UM
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the fear of intimacy with helping professionals scale
Lau,Ying1,3; Chan,Kin Sun2
2019-06-19
Source PublicationPLoS ONE
ISSN19326203
Volume13Issue:5
AbstractObjectives This study aimed to evaluate the internal consistency, reliability, convergent validity, known-group comparisons, and structural validity of the Chinese version of Fear of Intimacy with Helping Professionals (C–FIS–HP) scale in Macau. Methods A cross-sectional design was used on a sample of 593 older people in 6 health centers. We used Chinese version of Exercise of Self-Care Agency Scale (C-ESCAS) and Morisky 4-item medication adherence scale to evaluate self-care actions and medication adherence. The internal consistency and reliability of C–FIS–HP were analyzed using the Spearman-Brown split-half reliability, Cronbach’s alpha, and test–retest reliability. Convergent validity was tested the construct of C–FIS–HP and self-care actions. Known-group comparisons differentiated predefined groups in an expected direction. Two separated samples were used to test the structural validity. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) tested the factor structure of C–FISHP using the principal axis factoring. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was further conducted to confirm the factor structure constructed in the prior EFA. Results The C–FIS–HP had a Spearman-Brown split-half coefficient, Cronbach’s alpha, and intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.96, 0.93, and 0.96, respectively. Convergent validity was satisfactory with significantly correlations between the C-FIS-HP and C-ESCAS. C–FIS–HP to differentiate the differences between high-, moderate-, and low- medication adherence groups. EFA demonstrated a two-factor structure among 297 older people. A first-order CFA was performed to confirm the construct dimensionality of C–FIS–HP with satisfactory fit indices (NFI = 0.92; IFI = 0.95; TLI = 0.94; CFI = 0.95 and RMSEA = 0.07) among 296 older people. Conclusions C–FIS–HP is a reliable and valid test for assessing helping relationships in older Chinese people. Health professionals can use C–FIS–HP as a clinical tool to assess the comfort level of patients in a helping relationship, and use this information to develop culturally sensitive therapeutic interventions and treatment plans. Further studies need to be conducted concerning the different psychometric properties, as well as the application of C–FIS–HP in various regions.
DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0196774
URLView the original
Language英语
Fulltext Access
Citation statistics
Cited Times [WOS]:1   [WOS Record]     [Related Records in WOS]
Document TypeJournal article
CollectionUniversity of Macau
Corresponding AuthorLau,Ying
Affiliation1.Department of Alice Lee Centre for Nursing StudiesYong Loo Lin School of MedicineNational University of Singapore,Singapore
2.Faculty of Social Sciences and HumanitiesUniversity of MacauMacau Special Administration Region,Macao
3.School of Health SciencesMacao Polytechnic InstituteMacau Special Administration Region,Macao
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
Lau,Ying,Chan,Kin Sun. Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the fear of intimacy with helping professionals scale[J]. PLoS ONE,2019,13(5).
APA Lau,Ying,&Chan,Kin Sun.(2019).Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the fear of intimacy with helping professionals scale.PLoS ONE,13(5).
MLA Lau,Ying,et al."Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the fear of intimacy with helping professionals scale".PLoS ONE 13.5(2019).
Related Services
Recommend this item
Bookmark
Usage statistics
Export to Endnote
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Lau,Ying]'s Articles
[Chan,Kin Sun]'s Articles
Baidu academic
Similar articles in Baidu academic
[Lau,Ying]'s Articles
[Chan,Kin Sun]'s Articles
Bing Scholar
Similar articles in Bing Scholar
[Lau,Ying]'s Articles
[Chan,Kin Sun]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
All comments (0)
No comment.
 

Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.