Which Chinese cities are more inclusive and why?
Hu,Wanyang1; Wang,Rui2
Source PublicationCities

China's household registration system allows local governments to control migration by limiting migrants’ eligibility to local public services. Many cities exclude migrant residents from important social benefits, which reduces labor mobility and contributes to the socioeconomic gap between migrants and urban natives. This study measures the extent of China's local migration restriction from the perspective of inclusive provision of public services and explains cross-city disparities. We define urban inclusiveness as the extent to which migrants can access social benefits provided locally and construct an urban inclusiveness index using factor analysis. We find significant cross-city differences in urban inclusiveness toward migrants. Statistical analyses suggest that local fiscal capacity and labor demand, instead of cultural tradition, are the major determinants of urban inclusiveness. We further use the gap between the inclusiveness toward high- and low-skilled migrants to measure local skill-based migration selectivity. We find that more developed cities, i.e., cities with larger populations, higher levels of gross regional product per capita, and greater shares of industrial sector, are more selective based on migrants’ skills, while cultural openness does not help bring down skill-based selectivity. Our research suggests an instrumental view of migrants in China's urban policy that contributes to social inequality and the lack of labor mobility, which can restrict China's development in the long term.

KeywordChina Inclusive City Migration Restriction Social Benefit
URLView the original
Indexed BySSCI
WOS Research AreaUrban Studies
WOS SubjectUrban Studies
WOS IDWOS:000459236400005
Fulltext Access
Citation statistics
Cited Times [WOS]:1   [WOS Record]     [Related Records in WOS]
Document TypeJournal article
CollectionUniversity of Macau
Corresponding AuthorWang,Rui
Affiliation1.Department of Government and Public AdministrationHumanities and Social Sciences Building (E21)University of Macau,Macau,China
2.The Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International StudiesJohns Hopkins University,Washington,20036,United States
First Author AffilicationUniversity of Macau
Recommended Citation
GB/T 7714
Hu,Wanyang,Wang,Rui. Which Chinese cities are more inclusive and why?[J]. Cities,2018,86:51-61.
APA Hu,Wanyang,&Wang,Rui.(2018).Which Chinese cities are more inclusive and why?.Cities,86,51-61.
MLA Hu,Wanyang,et al."Which Chinese cities are more inclusive and why?".Cities 86(2018):51-61.
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Related Services
Recommend this item
Usage statistics
Export to Endnote
Google Scholar
Similar articles in Google Scholar
[Hu,Wanyang]'s Articles
[Wang,Rui]'s Articles
Baidu academic
Similar articles in Baidu academic
[Hu,Wanyang]'s Articles
[Wang,Rui]'s Articles
Bing Scholar
Similar articles in Bing Scholar
[Hu,Wanyang]'s Articles
[Wang,Rui]'s Articles
Terms of Use
No data!
Social Bookmark/Share
All comments (0)
No comment.

Items in the repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.