UM
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the fear of intimacy with helping professionals scale
Lau,Ying1,3; Chan,Kin Sun2
2019-06-19
Source PublicationPLoS ONE
ISSN19326203
Volume13Issue:5
AbstractObjectives This study aimed to evaluate the internal consistency, reliability, convergent validity, known-group comparisons, and structural validity of the Chinese version of Fear of Intimacy with Helping Professionals (C–FIS–HP) scale in Macau. Methods A cross-sectional design was used on a sample of 593 older people in 6 health centers. We used Chinese version of Exercise of Self-Care Agency Scale (C-ESCAS) and Morisky 4-item medication adherence scale to evaluate self-care actions and medication adherence. The internal consistency and reliability of C–FIS–HP were analyzed using the Spearman-Brown split-half reliability, Cronbach’s alpha, and test–retest reliability. Convergent validity was tested the construct of C–FIS–HP and self-care actions. Known-group comparisons differentiated predefined groups in an expected direction. Two separated samples were used to test the structural validity. An exploratory factor analysis (EFA) tested the factor structure of C–FISHP using the principal axis factoring. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was further conducted to confirm the factor structure constructed in the prior EFA. Results The C–FIS–HP had a Spearman-Brown split-half coefficient, Cronbach’s alpha, and intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.96, 0.93, and 0.96, respectively. Convergent validity was satisfactory with significantly correlations between the C-FIS-HP and C-ESCAS. C–FIS–HP to differentiate the differences between high-, moderate-, and low- medication adherence groups. EFA demonstrated a two-factor structure among 297 older people. A first-order CFA was performed to confirm the construct dimensionality of C–FIS–HP with satisfactory fit indices (NFI = 0.92; IFI = 0.95; TLI = 0.94; CFI = 0.95 and RMSEA = 0.07) among 296 older people. Conclusions C–FIS–HP is a reliable and valid test for assessing helping relationships in older Chinese people. Health professionals can use C–FIS–HP as a clinical tool to assess the comfort level of patients in a helping relationship, and use this information to develop culturally sensitive therapeutic interventions and treatment plans. Further studies need to be conducted concerning the different psychometric properties, as well as the application of C–FIS–HP in various regions.
DOI10.1371/journal.pone.0196774
URLView the original
Language英语
全文获取链接
引用统计
被引频次[WOS]:1   [WOS记录]     [WOS相关记录]
Document TypeJournal article
专题University of Macau
Corresponding AuthorLau,Ying
Affiliation1.Department of Alice Lee Centre for Nursing StudiesYong Loo Lin School of MedicineNational University of Singapore,Singapore
2.Faculty of Social Sciences and HumanitiesUniversity of MacauMacau Special Administration Region,Macao
3.School of Health SciencesMacao Polytechnic InstituteMacau Special Administration Region,Macao
推荐引用方式
GB/T 7714
Lau,Ying,Chan,Kin Sun. Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the fear of intimacy with helping professionals scale[J]. PLoS ONE,2019,13(5).
APA Lau,Ying,&Chan,Kin Sun.(2019).Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the fear of intimacy with helping professionals scale.PLoS ONE,13(5).
MLA Lau,Ying,et al."Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the fear of intimacy with helping professionals scale".PLoS ONE 13.5(2019).
个性服务
推荐该条目
保存到收藏夹
查看访问统计
导出为Endnote文件
Google Scholar
中相似的文章 Google Scholar
[Lau,Ying]的文章
[Chan,Kin Sun]的文章
Baidu academic
中相似的文章 Baidu academic
[Lau,Ying]的文章
[Chan,Kin Sun]的文章
Bing Scholar
中相似的文章 Bing Scholar
[Lau,Ying]的文章
[Chan,Kin Sun]的文章
相关权益政策
暂无数据
收藏/分享
所有评论 (0)
暂无评论
 

除非特别说明,本系统中所有内容都受版权保护,并保留所有权利。